CUP #358 Coffee Cup Collection

The wave carrying energy to your toaster, your phone, your eye is the same contagious-laughter happy-vibe pop-and-lock rock flowing thumping-theta bumping tribal-beat. Perhaps the oscillation of thought transfer to consciousness can't be measured like a tsunamis or tango, but the wave the is ever-present to provided the exchange.

Could science have it wrong? Could ESP be as simple as a thought (A) on a wave perceived (B) as quantum mechanics describes? 

The idea behind sound waves, thought waves, energy waves

y belief is that the reason life feels linear is because like all energy our thought, perception, travels through matter as a wave.

Whoa…what? 

Well…if the theory of special relativity means that on a traveling train time elapses to one observer based on the train’s speed, and a fixed observer not on the train observes a difference in that time, then our perception of time is what is actually being calculated, not time.

Tied together is the observer and the speed relative to light. What is the difference in these two energies and how they are traveling. Consciousness travels a fixed to matter? light travels unafixed? Could it be that consciousness or our perception of is ground zero for wave travel and per our ability to perceive light traveling on wave is at the ultimate speed our perception can calculate?

Time is a human construct of perception. Is it any wonder that the speed of light is the top speed? Perhaps it’s the speed in which our consciousness travels that delineates time’s speed and not just the speed in which light travels? Does math do coincidences or does math show us relationships that are inextricable?

Meaning, consciousness the observer is connected to the speed of light, or time.

If consciousness is connected to the speed of light, then why wouldn’t our consciousness emerge as a pattern too. Like the sound wave emerges plotted on the graph by math, where is the mathematical interpretation of our consciousness? Because time is percieved /felt by individual entities within our species, it has been masked. It is as a collection that perception understanding of time must as well.

I only care to observe that time and it’s perception are coupled with the speed of light and decoupled is an individuals perception from another individuals perception. energy from matter. In other words events plotted with just matter and not the perception of felt time, collapse into a timeline. The human experience devoid individual perceptions in time space. 

we can look for the pattern in consciousness to develop. History, our perception of time as a movement, must also create a virtual amassing. The pattern of our time elapsing is a timeline or in mathematical terms “the line”.  A consciousness can stack time in various ways. The calendar might even make one think the template is circular, but if the collection or amassed accounting of time is taken into a singular perspective, a line is tabulated. Not because time is felt to all at once, but because each consciousness is accounting for time in incalculable points of space. When space is flattened, all moments collapsed into one point in time, the shape defined is singular and repeating. This is in our human understanding a line. 

Thus, I ask, why do we see thought as some contraption our brain developes, and not more the conveyor belt taking us through a collection of intersecting radiating point in matter. Is our life, not more a film frozen that we float through becoming playable when we are present and permanent til the next consciousness flows through. Certainly would explain the Presbyterian predestination. (FYI: that theoretical idea being my Fleming ancestors and their metaphysical interpretations of God/ (See Robert Fleming Senior and Robert Fleming Jr.)

Because we feel special, have our own experience, doesn’t mean statistically (mathematically) an individual experience is relevant. A snow flake in an avalanche is irrelevant. The snow flake’s journey non-causal in every calculation in the avalanche’s existence. Our personal experience has no bearing on, or relevance to, what our collective reality on the Universe is. Therefore, they can be in complete contradiction to each other human math is bound scientifically. 

Waves should actually be called “disturbances.” A wave is not a thing, it is a state of being. When atoms shift they tell one another. Not unlike water turns to ice and snow, atoms conveys their altered state through transformation. Atoms are said to vibrate transferring energy to surrounding atoms. Math and graphs and other tools of human calculation define this state as energy passing through matter in the form of a wave. 

I believe that is a scientific assumption based on ability to observe visually. Of course, math will confirm this reality because math confirms all our observable realities. But what if humans couldn’t observe what was happening to the atom. 

I believe atoms become momentarily insolvent no longer acting as a particle, but instead taking on the property of a wave as the displacement continues or echos. 

The only reason matter isn’t seen to be the wave itself is because we are observing it. Remember, math is based on human observation. It can’t calculate non-human experience. It just can’t. It’s illogical to say it can. Yet experiements have documented the inexplicable transformation of particle to wave when an atom isn’t being observed. I’m proposing, this is the conduction or process a particle undergoes during matter displacement or energy conduction. 

To the Universe (I’ve capital this concept because I use the word as a state were a non-observer can exist) energy sweeps through directly never pinning a wave into matter. To the Universe, the collection of matter forming the tree is not different than the air surrounding the the tree. Sure the tree, the guitar string, the bell are tightly amassed but they are water all the same. A deluge of water, ice or snow create similar impacts as tree, string and bell. 

To head further down the rabbit hole, I ask, why do sound waves even exist if our potential as observers aren’t present to maintain matter as a tree? My best extrapolation is that we are not the only spieces with a collective consciousness to interpret and constrain matter. We know that trees have a language too. Our botanical brethren are not just material. They use energy as we do to live, breathe and exist in a matrix of consciousness. Perhaps the questions should be: if all life is gone, can energy exist? 

Whether you're drinking your morning coffee, evening tea, or something in between – this mug's for you! It's sturdy and glossy with a vivid print that'll withstand the microwave and dishwasher.

• Ceramic
• 11 oz mug dimensions: 3.85″ (9.8 cm) in height, 3.35″ (8.5 cm) in diameter
• 15 oz mug dimensions: 4.7″ (12 cm) in height, 3.35″ (8.5 cm) in diameter
• Dishwasher and microwave safe
• Blank product sourced from China